Re: Findings from test compile of KDE

Am 16.08.26 um 13:16 schrieb sicarine ([email protected] via blfs-dev
Mailing List):
> Morning,
> 
> Last night I had a go at testing some plasma packages on my system, so I 
> thought I might email with some findings. I tested KF6 6.29.0 with gear 26.04.3 
> and plasma 6.7.4.
> 
> Four new packages are required: corrosion-rs is now a dependency of kdeplasma-
> addons, tesseract is now a dependency of spectacle (and it itself depends on a 
> package called leptonica), finally kmime is now part of kde frameworks.

They can't help but adding bloat - not even the storage-crisis can stop
them.  Reminds one of obsessive-compulsive disorder.  What's worse: they
make it "required".  An OCR-engine _required_ for a screenshot-utility?
 Really?  What's going on in those minds?

Such are the things that make me wonder whether one shouldn't outright
advise against using KDE-stuff.

[ snip ]

> That's it about it. Things seem to be working fine on my end. Nothing broke. 
> Nothing seems to have installed in the wrong place, no lib64 directories 
> sprung up, nothing ended up in /usr, so seems fine. All good.

Does "all good" include finally _fully_ working session-restore in a
wayland-session? [1]

Thanks.

Rainer

[1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436318

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page