Re: Findings from test compile of KDE

Rainer Fiebig ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 16.08.26 um 18:41 schrieb sicarine ([email protected] via blfs-dev
Mailing List):
> On Sunday, 16 August 2026 08:15:30 EDT Rainer Fiebig wrote:
>> Am 16.08.26 um 13:16 schrieb sicarine ([email protected] via blfs-dev
> 
>> Does "all good" include finally _fully_ working session-restore in a
>> wayland-session? [1]
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Rainer
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436318
> 
> I think that bug is still there in the 6.7 series. On my end, I usually boot 
> to a clean session, so I don't usually run into it. I think I heard them 
> mention somewhere that wayland stuff takes a bit to develop because it depends 
> on pushing plasma wayland protocol releases, which in turn sometimes depend on 
> tooling that won't land until another qt version is released. Makes it odd for 
> them to so aggressively push to try going wayland-only with 6.8 in october, 
> since I don't think qt-6.12 is due until november. 

Thanks.  Like hibernate, session-restore is an essential
productivity-feature of a contemporary desktop to me.  It's been there
and much appreciated since KDE-4, IIRC.  The "X Session Management
Protocol" that made it possible was published in 1992.  In other words:
it's something that users could rely on since ancient times.

So - imposing a regression of epic proportions on their users by making
wayland the default for a Plasma-6-session was borderline already, I
think.  But if this regression is still not fully fixed, going
wayland-only and thus bereaving users of an alternative (X11), would
seem reckless and irresponsible.

> 
> But the important point is it builds, at least.

And don't forget: you get an OCR-powered screenshot-utility now! ;)


Rainer

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.