Re: Findings from test compile of KDE
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 16.08.26 um 18:41 schrieb sicarine ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List): > On Sunday, 16 August 2026 08:15:30 EDT Rainer Fiebig wrote: >> Am 16.08.26 um 13:16 schrieb sicarine ([email protected] via blfs-dev > >> Does "all good" include finally _fully_ working session-restore in a >> wayland-session? [1] >> >> Thanks. >> >> Rainer >> >> [1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436318 > > I think that bug is still there in the 6.7 series. On my end, I usually boot > to a clean session, so I don't usually run into it. I think I heard them > mention somewhere that wayland stuff takes a bit to develop because it depends > on pushing plasma wayland protocol releases, which in turn sometimes depend on > tooling that won't land until another qt version is released. Makes it odd for > them to so aggressively push to try going wayland-only with 6.8 in october, > since I don't think qt-6.12 is due until november. Thanks. Like hibernate, session-restore is an essential productivity-feature of a contemporary desktop to me. It's been there and much appreciated since KDE-4, IIRC. The "X Session Management Protocol" that made it possible was published in 1992. In other words: it's something that users could rely on since ancient times. So - imposing a regression of epic proportions on their users by making wayland the default for a Plasma-6-session was borderline already, I think. But if this regression is still not fully fixed, going wayland-only and thus bereaving users of an alternative (X11), would seem reckless and irresponsible. > > But the important point is it builds, at least. And don't forget: you get an OCR-powered screenshot-utility now! ;) Rainer -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page