Re: upgrading glibc-2.40 -> 2.41

Am 25.06.25 um 09:39 schrieb tjoen ([email protected] via blfs-support
Mailing List):
> Diff between what is provided by the two glibc's:
> 
> --- g240    2025-06-25 08:36:31.971923893 +0200
> +++ g241    2025-06-25 08:37:14.871965506 +0200
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> -config(glibc) = 2.40-2
> -glibc = 2.40-2
> -glibc(x86-64) = 2.40-2
> +config(glibc) = 2.41-1
> +glibc = 2.41-1
> +glibc(x86-64) = 2.41-1
>  ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
>  ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
>  ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.38)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.39)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
> +libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.41)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.5)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.6)(64bit)
>  libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit)
> @@ -86,6 +87,7 @@
>  libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.39)(64bit)
>  libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
>  libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.40)(64bit)
> +libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.41)(64bit)
>  libmemusage.so()(64bit)
>  libmvec.so.1()(64bit)
>  libmvec.so.1(GLIBC_2.22)(64bit)
> 
> I am afraid rebuilding the whole system is unavoidable
Back in February I updated from -2.35 to -2.41, following the
instructions in the book.  There was an initial issue with "fixed"
headers (short thread here on blfs-support) but that was about all.  The
only packages I rebuilt at the time were the kernel and gcc which I
updated to -11.5.0.  No problems since then.

Rainer

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-support
Unsubscribe: See the above information page