Re: Test failed for libseccomp-2.6.0 BLFS 12.3 (SysV Version)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/20/25 9:24 PM, azazel xes ([email protected] via blfs-support Mailing List) wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to install libseccomp-2.6.0 but when doing the make check I got 1 of 1 test > failed, attached is the last part of the make check output. > > Regression Test Summary > tests run: 7941 > tests skipped: 174 > tests passed: 7933 > tests failed: 8 > tests errored: 509 > ============================================================ > FAIL: regression > ================== > 1 of 1 test failed > ================== > make[2]: *** [Makefile:1463: check-TESTS] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [Makefile:1589: check-am] Error 2 > make: *** [Makefile:529: check-recursive] Error 1 > > > I see that following message repeats a lot when the test started to fail: > > /usr/bin/env: ‘python’: No such file or directory > > > My build environment: > > LFS: 12.2 (SysV Version) > BLFS: 12.3 > > > Required optional dependencies for libseccomp-2.6.0: > > Which-2.23 (Installed GNU which package) > Valgrind-3.24.0 (Not installed) > cython-3.0.12 (Installed) > LCOV (Not installed) > > > Command used to install libseccomp-2.6.0: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-python && > make > > > Looking at /usr/bin I see that I have: > > azazel-xes@lfs-12-2 [ /usr/bin ]$ > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jan 14 2025 python3 -> python3.12 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 19824 Jan 14 2025 python3.12 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3012 Jan 14 2025 python3.12-config > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Jan 14 2025 python3-config -> python3.12-config > > > Did I miss something somewhere the road that I should have ended with an /env > directory or a ‘python’ file or symlink to it? It's hard to say. I just installed that package yesterday on a lfs-12.4/blfs-12.4 (both will be released on September 1st) and got: tests run: 7973 tests skipped: 46 tests passed: 7973 tests failed: 0 tests errored: 0 It's a big deal to upgrade Python to 3.13 because you have to rebuild all the modules. You might want to try just using './configure --prefix=/usr --disable-static' and see if you get different results. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-support Unsubscribe: See the above information page