Re: Seamonkey
"Vivaldi" ([email protected] via blfs-support Mailing List) <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:21:31 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/5/25 8:41 AM, Rainer Fiebig ([email protected] via blfs-support Mailing List) wrote: > As always, the last SA for Seamonkey reads like a horror-story. But I still > like that package, not least because the whole suite builds in just ~14 minutes > with -j6 on my moderate systems. Compare that to at least 30 minutes for > Firefox alone. > > This mail composed and sent with Seamonkey-2.53.22. ;) > > Rainer > > I also installed Seamonkey at the last release due to its faster compiling. And in addition, it doesn't require node which saves more time. Unfortunately, some addresses were modified when importing from Thunderbird. I also had some problems with filters. Being somewhat spooked I continued with Thunderbird. So I'm curios, you mention Seamonkey reads like a horror story. What are the disadvantages of Seamonkey as it seems too good to be true? I assume it's less vibrant than Firefox/Thunderbird. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-support Unsubscribe: See the above information page