Re: [LFS Trac] #5651: The sanity check in chapter 5 Glibc isn't very meaningful

"LFS Trac" ([email protected] via lfs-book Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.book
Message-ID <[email protected]>
#5651: The sanity check in chapter 5 Glibc isn't very meaningful
-------------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  Xi Ruoyao    |       Owner:  lfs-book
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  12.4
Component:  Book         |     Version:  git
 Severity:  normal       |  Resolution:
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by Bruce Dubbs):

 To me the check is still valid.  It has become a confidence check for new
 users.  At this point the user has built the toolchain: binutils, gcc, and
 glibc.  Running this quick check shows users that they are on the right
 track.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5651#comment:2>
LFS Trac <https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-book
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.