Re: [LFS Trac] #5651: The sanity check in chapter 5 Glibc isn't very meaningful

"LFS Trac" ([email protected] via lfs-book Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.book
Message-ID <[email protected]>
#5651: The sanity check in chapter 5 Glibc isn't very meaningful
-------------------------+-------------------------
 Reporter:  Xi Ruoyao    |       Owner:  lfs-book
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  12.4
Component:  Book         |     Version:  git
 Severity:  normal       |  Resolution:  worksforme
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by Xi Ruoyao):

 I don't mean it should be removed.  I mean it should be enhanced.

 For example, the current check even cannot detect the problem when the
 user completely skipped chapter 5 binutils.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5651#comment:4>
LFS Trac <https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-book
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.