Re: [LFS Trac] #5785: Use kernel base+patch file

"LFS Trac" ([email protected] via lfs-book Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.book
Message-ID <[email protected]>
#5785: Use kernel base+patch file
-------------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  thomas       |       Owner:  lfs-book
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  12.5
Component:  Book         |     Version:  git
 Severity:  normal       |  Resolution:
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by Bruce Dubbs):

 What I propose is to add a section to the kernel page that describes this
 method and let the user choose.  However we should leave the default as it
 is.

 I do have a question about the patches though. When I look at upstream, I
 see:
 {{{
 linux-6.16.tar.xz                                  28-Jul-2025 04:09
 146M
 patch-6.16.1.xz                                    15-Aug-2025 14:52
 196K
 patch-6.16.2.xz                                    20-Aug-2025 17:07
 389K
 patch-6.16.3.xz                                    23-Aug-2025 14:54
 395K
 patch-6.16.4.xz                                    28-Aug-2025 14:58
 529K
 patch-6.16.xz                                      28-Jul-2025 04:09
 7M
 }}}

 Do those patches (1-4) need to be applied individually or is that
 patch-6.16.xz a cumulative patch? This would need to be explained.

 I will note that if a user wants to use a LTS kernel, the number of
 patches gets to be quite large.  For instance there is:

 patch-6.6.103.xz                                   28-Aug-2025 14:50
 5M

 For that matter:

 linux-5.4.297.tar.xz                               28-Aug-2025 14:28
 108M

 :)
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5785#comment:7>
LFS Trac <https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-book
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.