Re: Multiarch LFS

Alice Wonder <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I run both CentOS and Fedora but at this point I don't run any 32-bit 
apps because they are no longer needed.

The former reason use to be to run 32-bit browser for 32 bit plugins but 
flash is now available 64 bit and Java - I believe there is a 64-bit 
Java plugin from Oracle but there are so many bad security issues with 
Oracle Java I no longer allow it on my system.

Anyway, even though I can run 32-bit apps on Fedora / CentOS there is no 
need to, not for me anyway.

Maybe some commercial 3rd party apps are 32-bit only. I suspect that is 
getting to be rare.

On 2/10/2013 11:18 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Has anybody entertained the idea of multiarch (not current multilib) on
> an LFS style build yet? I intend to do this, but if anybody has already
> done so, I'd appreciate notes, patches, and what not.
>
> For those unfamiliar: http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/
>   From my POV, unlike the previous disagreement of lib<qual> amongst
> distributions, this _seems_ to be much cleaner and well thought out,
> especially with a couple of examples in place already (Fedora has been
> doing this in parallel as well as Debian and Ubuntu, but isn't really in
> the spotlight yet).
>
> -- DJ
>


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-chat
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.