Re: LFS meets goals AND constraints?
Richard Owlett <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
LM wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Richard Owlett <[email protected]> wrote: >> I hadn't asked asked quite the "right" question ;/ >> A better question might have been "What makes a minimal system?" A >> definitive answer is unlikely. A comparison of packages that Debian labels >> as "Essential &/or required", Slackware tags as "A", the order in which >> Linux From Scratch builds will likely point in a valuable direction. > > A system like this is supposed to be a minimal system that could still > bootstrap: > http://landley.net/aboriginal/about.html A useful reference point. My minimal system would be smaller as I don't have the "capable of compiling itself" constraint. > > You can check here for links to lightweight alternative libraries and programs: > http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Alternative_libraries > > If you check some of the uclibc or musl based distributions, many are > fairly minimal and will give you an idea of what basics you need in a > system. > -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page