Re: Logging what got installed

Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.general
Message-ID <20150517234837.GA4878@milliways>
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:21:23AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> TLDR; : logging what gets installed or updated can be painful
> 
more than I thought!
> 
> Seems to work, so my logging must now be 110% correct ;-)
> 
except that when I used it to build LFS, the output for coreutils
missed a lot of programs (the few in /bin that had been symlinked to
/tools were accounted for, but other new entries such as chmod
disappeared.
> 
> Anyway, for a normal build the diff of the before and after logs was
> ok, after I had sorted out exactly what to do (trad diff: 'c'
> records to change 1 or many lines [1], deletions[2], '---'[3],
> additions [4] ; other a or d headers [5]; additions [6] or deletions
> [7] - processes listed below.
> 
'diff' is set to produce the minimal changes needed to convert one
version of a file to another.  The 'c' records for many lines can
include a block - in this case more lines were added than removed.

I'm still exploring this, and I can see a few possible solutions
(apart from writing a C program!), but the elapsed time might be
interesting.  Probably, 'comm' (which needs 'sort -n') will be
involved.  After finding that bug, I think I'll let this thread die,
it is becoming too embarassing.

ĸen
-- 
Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady.
Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.