On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, DontSendMeMail wrote:
> > For future reference, I keep special reserves of contempt for
> > passive-aggressive behaviour such as this.
>
> Oh, now you hurt my feelings. Don't say that, I won't be able to
> sleep at night if you don't like me! Can I get back in your good
> books? Can I? Please? What do I need to do? I'll be good, I
> promise! In the future, you can insult me all you want, and I'll
> just sit and soak it up, but please, please, don't have contempt
> for me! I couldn't live life that way!
>
> > I can only suppose it's voluntary soft-skulledness that's kept you from
> > being able to figure out which portions of qmail could be chrooted and
> > which portions can't be because there'll be no point in doing so.
>
> No, actually, I figured out part of it on my own, and someone posted
> quite a useful post filling in a lot of the details. As has been
> expressed three times now in clarification to the original post, the
> question is what to do with those that can't be chrooted.
>
> > Chroot jails are _not_ a panacea. They are only a tool. Use them if you
> > can, but if you can't, be smart enough to recognize that you're trying to
> > use the _wrong tool for the job_.
>
> And the right tool would be _____? I've gotten quite a bit of useful
> information from some people, and childish name-calling from others...
Look if you want to assume I was calling _you_ names and then act like a
collossal twit about it, then you can merrily well figure it out for
yourself.
--
Unsubscribe: send email to [email protected]
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-security' in the subject header of the message
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.