the importance of gpg or The Web of Trust
Ken Dyke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1034329883.12895.105.camel@FatBoy> |
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 03:25, Max wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:11:01PM -0500, Paul Roberts wrote: > > > The real solution to this is to start sending emails to the maintainers of > > every package you build that does _not_ have a published public key and > > signature file, and ask them to start signing their releases. > > Thats what I'm doing since the irssi trojan. I keep a list of projects, > emails, date and reply status of everybody I sent an email concerning > pgp signatures to. The scary thing is that _not a single project_ that > I have asked has started to provide pgp sigs yet! That includes huge and > widely used projects like samba and mozilla as well as smaller projects > like licq and xchat. Some "developers" dont even know of pgp. I hope > our pgp-advocating crackers will show them, the hard way. :) Cracking is not the answer but then I think you knew that already. > What do you think of a webpage containing > 1) a list of projects that have pgp sigs > 2) a list of projects that dont have pgp sigs + contact information > 3) a mini-howto explaining how to use (and the importance of) gpg/pgp > > pgp-aware users could use this list to easily get contact information > for every project so they can send them email requesting pgp sigs. and > project maintainers could put a link to the pgp howto so their pgp-unaware > users could learn how to verify the pgp sigs. > > the first two points should be 'interactive', so everybody can add a > project to the database and update its status. I am going to a "key signing" party next week in Billings. Been reading a lot of material advocating webs of trust, key signing, community building, blah, blah, and so on. Anyway, as regards package signing I think this sort of thing is an excellent idea. I will have a lot more to say about this in the future. Right now I need to go to bed. -- I think, therefore, ken_i_m Chief Gadgeteer, Elegant Innovations
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9pp8Z8MCUo3oeQ4kRAqUBAJ4sO0/hlLRDjsgSnL734JgPD4f5FgCeOfdV CTJYAvxH5HPbg5mtLqdAAGw= =0Atw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----