Re: kernel security issue
Ken Dyke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1038169436.3901.2420.camel@FatBoy> |
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 12:23, Christophe Devine wrote: > Actually, I though about waiting 2 or 3 years without disclosing > this bug, so that all 2.6 kernels became vulnerable too. > Then, write an apache or whatever worm and bring down large parts > of the Internet. However, that would have been considered a little > bit rude, so I changed my mind ;-) LOL! That actually makes for a good argument against some self-described blackhats that are trying to disrupt all discussion of full disclosure on a mailing list I am subscribed to. It almost goes without saying that they are against disclosure of any kind. I am sure they absolutely hate it when their favorite 'sploit gets patched. -- I think, therefore, ken_i_m Chief Gadgeteer, Elegant Innovations
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA94TVa8MCUo3oeQ4kRAvOBAJ9nEkrUg2woyBdi8jJMAi/B+8GE6ACfTerH ru/N6dC27K3DZ8+YvJGwPRc= =AbXV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----