Re: kernel security issue

Ken Dyke <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Message-ID <1038169436.3901.2420.camel@FatBoy>
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 12:23, Christophe Devine wrote:
>  Actually, I though about waiting 2 or 3 years without disclosing
> this bug, so that all 2.6 kernels became vulnerable too.
>  Then, write an apache or whatever worm and bring down large parts
> of the Internet. However, that would have been considered a little
> bit rude, so I changed my mind ;-)

LOL!  That actually makes for a good argument against some
self-described blackhats that are trying to disrupt all discussion of
full disclosure on a mailing list I am subscribed to.  It almost goes
without saying that they are against disclosure of any kind.  I am sure
they absolutely hate it when their favorite 'sploit gets patched.

-- 
I think, therefore, ken_i_m
Chief Gadgeteer,
Elegant Innovations
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA94TVa8MCUo3oeQ4kRAvOBAJ9nEkrUg2woyBdi8jJMAi/B+8GE6ACfTerH
ru/N6dC27K3DZ8+YvJGwPRc=
=AbXV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.