[OT] Re: no more buffer overflows

Daniel Roethlisberger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Archaic <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm starting to think there are few subscribed to this list judging by
> the nearly non-existant discussion.

This is getting increasingly off-topic, but I think many "use" this list
primarily as a means to be informed about important LFS-relevant
security announcements without having to follow lfs-discuss et al, which
tends to be overly time-consuming.

cheers,
dan


-- 
   Daniel Roethlisberger <[email protected]>
   OpenPGP key id 0x804A06B1 (1024/4096 DSA/ElGamal)
   144D 6A5E 0C88 E5D7 0775 FCFD 3974 0E98 804A 06B1
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+tuP3OXQOmIBKBrERAjanAJ9X3/PgBfzggs16UjM65B7bvqxvuwCdEmKw
x7lKChsFEqwpM/moAcpFpAk=
=wQ6A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.