Re: glibc vulnerability
Marnix Kaart <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 02 June 2003 00:03, Dagmar d'Surreal wrote: > ..and more to the point, here's an annotated diff that people should > start applying to glibc. It was assembled directly from the components > listed in CERT Advisory CA-2003-10. Since glibc-2.3.2 is not vulnerable > to this, if you are currently building using the current CVS tree of > LFS, you don't need to worry about it. Everyone else using any version > of glibc previous to 2.3.2 (2.3.1, 2.2.5, etc) should apply this patch > to their glibc sources and rebuild to eliminate the vulnerability from > their system. I am planning to apply the patch and recompile glibc (2.3.1), but I'm not sure wether it is safe. In other words: will recompiling glibc break my system? And how about dependencies, do I need to worry about other packages stopping to work after glibc has been patched? Finally, can I just use the lfs (4.1) instructions from chapter 6 for this? Thanks! Marnix Kaart -- Marnix Kaart Reg. Linux User #267495 http://counter.li.org Reg. LFS User #5496 http://linuxfromscratch.org () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ - against proprietary formats -- -- Unsubscribe: send email to [email protected] and put 'unsubscribe lfs-security' in the subject header of the message