Re: glibc vulnerability

Marnix Kaart <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday 02 June 2003 00:03, Dagmar d'Surreal wrote:
> ..and more to the point, here's an annotated diff that people should
> start applying to glibc.  It was assembled directly from the components
> listed in CERT Advisory CA-2003-10.  Since glibc-2.3.2 is not vulnerable
> to this, if you are currently building using the current CVS tree of
> LFS, you don't need to worry about it.  Everyone else using any version
> of glibc previous to 2.3.2 (2.3.1, 2.2.5, etc) should apply this patch
> to their glibc sources and rebuild to eliminate the vulnerability from
> their system.

I am planning to apply the patch and recompile glibc (2.3.1), but I'm not sure 
wether it is safe.  In other words: will recompiling glibc break my system? 
And how about dependencies, do I need to worry about other packages stopping 
to work after glibc has been patched? Finally, can I just use the lfs (4.1) 
instructions from chapter 6 for this?

Thanks!
Marnix Kaart

-- 
Marnix Kaart
Reg. Linux User #267495        http://counter.li.org
Reg.  LFS  User  #5496   http://linuxfromscratch.org

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail 
/\                        - against proprietary formats

--

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to [email protected]
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-security' in the subject header of the message
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.