Re: Argh, infected!
Dan Osterrath <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2003 14:13 schrieb Dan Osterrath: > Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2003 13:53 schrieb Sam Barnett-Cormack: > > On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote: > > > [root@mnementh chkrootkit-0.42b]# ./chkrootkit | grep INFECTED > > > Checking `netstat'... INFECTED > > > > > > Okay, so I think I understand that... now what the heck do I do about > > > it? Anyone know? > > > > Further: false alarm. chkrootkit was checking for addr.h, and this was > > in the binary *only* until it was stripped. I stripped it, and now all > > is fine. > > 1. Why does chkrootkit think that there is a root kit in netstat when it > was compiled with addr.h? - Seems that it normaly does not do so and that > there exists a root kit that does. > 2. When you strip a binary you remove some extra information such as this > binary was compiled with addr.h. If you strip it the extra information gets > lost but it is still compiled with it and the root kit is still inside. > Unfortunately chkrootkit can not see it anymore. > > So don't be too optimistic that you are safe. > > Probably you yould give us your lfs version and we could verify our results > with yours... My netstat is infected, too. LFS 4.0, net-tools 1.60 Could anyone try it with a recent LFS? Probably its just a problem with the build instructions... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- %> ln -s /dev/null /dev/brain %> ln -s /dev/urandom /dev/world %> dd if=/dev/world of=/dev/brain -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/iphB9NbB8EM160MRAhp/AJ4nP1XfDERjRGe530RgkjMNe72ZLgCgjh/H 5eMvQmmIMfH7sNH2KsMrX8E= =ejzy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----