Re: Secure Linux From Scratch
Archaic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 04:06:35PM +0100, Miguel Bazdresch wrote: > > My own suggestions follow. I see two big slices in the security pie: > <..> > I think covering both aspects in necessary and gives maximum > security. What good is it to lock down the kernel if then you go and > run xmule as root? (an extreme example to illustrate my point). Miguel, you're thinking the same as me. (be scared). :) Yes, there must be someway to differentiate level of importance and which systems should definately apply said techniques. Your suggestion seems a good way to do it. > This is the kind of book I'd like to read - and this is the kind of > book that I don't think exists today. Exactly. -- Archaic Morality is always the product of terror; its chains and strait-waistcoats are fashioned by those who dare not trust others, because they dare not trust themselves, to walk in liberty. - Aldous Huxley -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page