Re: Secure Linux From Scratch

> I'm getting an abnormal amount of failures from gcc-3.3.2 make check in
> chapter 6 with libsafe installed right after glibc in chapter 6. Anyone
> else want to try this? I'm also following the propolice hint, but it is not
> known for creating these extra failures.
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-names.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/duff-2.c (test for excess errors)
> I've seen these two before.

saw these too.

> These four and new to me.
> FAIL: g++.dg/expr/anew1.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.dg/expr/anew2.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.dg/expr/anew3.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.dg/expr/anew4.C execution test

same thing. I sent the libsafe team a mail explaining the situation. Hopefully 
this will shed some light. By the way, the source for these tests does not 
contain any references to libsafe protected functions (they use allocate) 
Could it be the use of /etc/ld.so.preload?

> Libsafe may have caused 2 failures in binutils testsuite, but I have to try
> it without propolice to be sure. This might be related to the binutils
> propolice bugs.

FAIL: S-records
FAIL: S-records with constructors

Talking about these? Will get to them, after the libsafe team (hopefully) 
answers. 

himicos
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page