Re: Opinions: role-based/mandatory access control implementations
Archaic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:08:13PM +1100, [email protected] wrote: > > Personally I'm trying to avoid using LSM. Same here, but you will be sticking with 2.4x kernels for a while as the 2.6 kernels have LSM in their framework. No biggie, really. I just started using 2.4 kernels on production machines just a few months ago. No rush to jump into 2.6. :) -- Archaic The prestige of government has undoubtedly been lowered considerably by the Prohibition law. For nothing is more destructive of respect for the government and the law of the land than passing laws which cannot be enforced. It is an open secret that the dangerous increase of crime in this country is closely connected with this. - Albert Einstein, "My First Impression of the U.S.A.", 1921 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page