Re: ATTN: Request for moving SLFS discussion

On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 02:52:31AM +0100, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> May I suggest you move the SLFS discussion to a dedicated mailing list?
> In my opinion, the SLFS "noise" level on lfs-security got way too high
> during the last few days. I am all in favour of creating an SLFS
> project, but please let lfs-security return to its previous state:
> low-traffic, security issues and announcments, and specific security
> questions. Thanks.

I'm sorry for this. While some may see this thread fitting the
description on the website, I know it has long been established that
this is a low-volume list for monitoring. I have already made the
request for a new list, but I have no control over when that happens.
Until then, whis is the most relevant list we have. Again, my apologies.
Things will return to normal ASAP.

-- 
Archaic

..every Man has a Property in his own Person. This no Body has any Right
to but himself.  The Labour of his Body, and the Work of his Hands, we
may say, are properly his. .... The great and chief end therefore, of
Mens uniting into Commonwealths, and putting themselves under
Government, is the Preservation of their Property.

- John Locke, "A Treatise Concerning Civil Government"

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page