Re: ATTN: Request for moving SLFS discussion
Ian Molton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Dragon Roost |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 13:18:07 -0500 Archaic <[email protected]> wrote: > Until then, whis is the most relevant list we have. Again, my apologies. > Things will return to normal ASAP. Can we change the description once we get slfs.* up and running so that lfs.security is clearly defined as a mioniotoring group? -- Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with ketchup. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page