Re: SLFS book chapter proposals
Christos Gioran <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Again we are boiling down to an earlier issue - Deciding on which way to > go. That will depend on who is going to contribute, and how much, and > how much work we are willing to do. Are we willing to go all out and > write a veritable tome on a secure Linux box? Or are we going to do a > smaller Collection of Links type thing that pushes the reader away form > the SLFS to other texts. Again, both ways have merit, both have their > place.The question is which way do we want to go? I am solidly on the > side of the Tome version ;) I know, lots and LOTS of work, but it could > evolve into a very useful guide. Will it be the masterpiece I envision? > Probably not, but that's not because of lack of talent. Just a lack of > time, or a decision to not replicate and duplicate existing works. I > guess it is up to the masses which way we go. > > My vote is in, and I'll sit back for a bit and see where it goes from > there. Well, that is exactly my question: Going anywhere beyond *building* a system requires touching a totally different aspect of the subject, resulting in a lot of work. Doing so leaves us with a book that is the ultimate security reference: Are we willing to take up such a daunting task? I say a team compiled by people with sufficient talent (but most of all time) could pull this through (and what a masterpiece it would be!!). I would like (and going) to participate in such an efford if it is decided. I vote: Let's build a self contained book, that if read will make the reader owner of a very secure box and enough knowledge to keep it that way. > Rob Day (BOFH) -- himicos -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page