Re: SLFS book chapter proposals

Christos Gioran <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Again we are boiling down to an earlier issue - Deciding on which way to
> go.  That will depend on who is going to contribute, and how much, and
> how much work we are willing to do.  Are we willing to go all out and
> write a veritable tome on a secure Linux box? Or are we going to do a
> smaller Collection of Links type thing that pushes the reader away form
> the SLFS to other texts. Again, both ways have merit, both have their
> place.The question is which way do we want to go?  I am solidly on the
> side of the Tome version ;)  I know, lots and LOTS of work, but it could
> evolve into a very useful guide. Will it be the masterpiece I envision?
> Probably not, but that's not because of lack of talent. Just a lack of
> time, or a decision to not replicate and duplicate existing works.  I
> guess it is up to the masses which way we go.
>
> My vote is in, and I'll sit back for a bit and see where it goes from
> there.

Well, that is exactly my question: Going anywhere beyond *building* a system 
requires touching a totally different aspect of the subject, resulting in a 
lot of work. Doing so leaves us with a book that is the ultimate security 
reference: Are we willing to take up such a daunting task? I say a team 
compiled by people with sufficient talent (but most of all time) could pull 
this through (and what a masterpiece it would be!!). I would like (and going) 
to participate in such an efford if it is decided. I vote: Let's build a self 
contained book, that if read will make the reader owner of a very secure box 
and enough knowledge to keep it that way.

>   Rob Day (BOFH)

-- 
himicos
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.