Re: SLFS book chapter proposals

Andrew Calkin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:38:59PM -0500, Archaic wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 05:59:31PM -0500, Robert Day wrote:
> > 
> > Again we are boiling down to an earlier issue - Deciding on which way to
> > go.  That will depend on who is going to contribute, and how much, and
> > how much work we are willing to do.  Are we willing to go all out and
> > write a veritable tome on a secure Linux box? Or are we going to do a
> > smaller Collection of Links type thing that pushes the reader away form
> > the SLFS to other texts. Again, both ways have merit, both have their
> > place.The question is which way do we want to go?  I am solidly on the
> > side of the Tome version ;)  I know, lots and LOTS of work, but it could
> > evolve into a very useful guide. Will it be the masterpiece I envision?
> > Probably not, but that's not because of lack of talent. Just a lack of
> > time, or a decision to not replicate and duplicate existing works.  I
> > guess it is up to the masses which way we go.
> > 
> > My vote is in, and I'll sit back for a bit and see where it goes from
> > there.
> 
> Even if we went with the tome concept (which I wouldn't), then we still
> need to have something tangible while the tome is being compiled. Ergo,
> the links solution should be our first goal. After the framework is laid
> out and the book written, how hard would it be to replace links with a
> dissertation if that was what was decided? Until then, I say let's have
> something that can be used as-is, instead of waiting.
> 
Just to pipe in, I agree with this approach. As we work on developing
the SLFS build, we will probably notice areas in which the referenced
links are deficient, and so the text in the tome will be a more complete
reference. That would probably be a good guide as to what order, or when
to replace links with text also- when a reference appears lacking 
something noteworthy, then a rewrite is performed to encompass this.

BTW, I really like the way these discussions are headed, if anything I
am getting even _more_ interested in the project than before!

//Andrew
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.