Re: SLFS book chapter proposals
Archaic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:14:46AM +0200, Christos Gioran wrote: > <..> > Hope this clarifies my sayings to this point. Apologies for any > inconsistencies. It does. :) > The point not clarified (at least IMO) as of yet is whether we will mention > only differences from the LFS book or list *all* compilation commands. My > proposal is that after deciding on the contents of the book, we will have a > clear idea of the extent of differences. If it is tolerable then document the > differences only. Otherwise (most probably) we will have to include all > instructions from the beginning. It would seem to me that if package X is done differently, give the entire build commands to build it. If it isn't done differently, but rather is just rebuilt with the hardened toolchain, then reference LFS. No need trying to keep in sync the same instructions as LFS. That could prove to be a hassle. -- Archaic Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page