Re: One SLFS book or two?

Archaic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:48:57AM -0500, Robert Day wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 05:08, Spencer Collyer wrote:
> > Something that (I think) has only briefly been touched on in the
> > discussion about SLFS, and that is are we looking at creating one
> > book or two? By this I mean, will there be just one book to cover
> > both LFS and BLFS, or will there be one book for each.
<..>
> Just a secure toolchain, system monitors, logfile security and
> analysis etc.  Book 2 is the network guide.

I envision one book. I don't think there is really any justification in
separating books. If you look at my proposal for chapter layout, you
will see LFS is first. That is paramount. Why build secure apps on an
insecure base? Then after that is done, we start BLFS. Also, as with
BLFS, the Securing BLFS will follow a non-linear path according to what
you have installed. If you have read any security books, you know they
aren't small. Why should ours be? With the exception of splitting, Rob
Day's vision is extremely close to mine. Get the LFS part out ASAP, then
work on the rest, adding as we can. The end result will always be
open-ended as things are constantly changing, giving us the long term
goal Rob spoke of.

-- 
Archaic

Idealism is the noble toga that political gentlemen drape over their
will to power.

- Aldous Huxley

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.