Re: One SLFS book or two?
Archaic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:48:57AM -0500, Robert Day wrote: > On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 05:08, Spencer Collyer wrote: > > Something that (I think) has only briefly been touched on in the > > discussion about SLFS, and that is are we looking at creating one > > book or two? By this I mean, will there be just one book to cover > > both LFS and BLFS, or will there be one book for each. <..> > Just a secure toolchain, system monitors, logfile security and > analysis etc. Book 2 is the network guide. I envision one book. I don't think there is really any justification in separating books. If you look at my proposal for chapter layout, you will see LFS is first. That is paramount. Why build secure apps on an insecure base? Then after that is done, we start BLFS. Also, as with BLFS, the Securing BLFS will follow a non-linear path according to what you have installed. If you have read any security books, you know they aren't small. Why should ours be? With the exception of splitting, Rob Day's vision is extremely close to mine. Get the LFS part out ASAP, then work on the rest, adding as we can. The end result will always be open-ended as things are constantly changing, giving us the long term goal Rob spoke of. -- Archaic Idealism is the noble toga that political gentlemen drape over their will to power. - Aldous Huxley -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page