Re: SLFS as an extention to LFS

Robert Day wrote:

> Anyhow, if it is decided finally that SLFS is to be patched into LFS,
> then I cannot change that, but I also cannot help much. It goes against
> what I believe security to be, and until it is complete, and prooven to
> be secure, and stable as the goals dictate it is to be, I can't trust it
> - I would feel constantly like I am building Fort Knox on top of a
> sandpit, instead of a reinforced concrete foundation with all the latest
> alarm technology.
> 

Whoa!  I missed that part...patched into LFS?  HOW!?!?!?!?  It 
definately needs to be a complete book of it's own.  Patching into LFS 
is a never ending moving target.  Follow LFS yes..for starters, but 
patched into LFS is a terrible mistake and a maintenence nightmare.  I 
tried to take it away (unknowingly) from that direction.

-- DJ

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page