Re: SLFS book chapter proposals

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 08:43:12AM -0500, Robert Day wrote:
> 
> Maybe it WOULD be better to follow released LFS, until suchg time as CVS
> reaches a bugfix-only freeze state - then we can start to migrate our
> hints and docs to the next release.

I'm starting to think we _should_ concentrate our efforts on LFS-5.x as
it will be built on a more seasoned kernel. LFS has the ability to
boldly move forward, where as the security world moves 2 steps forward,
then one step back. So perhaps the hint/book/whatever should for now
concentrate on LFS-5.0, then if we succeed in a reasonable time, the
amount of updating required for the then current LFS-5.x should be
minimal. Either way, the 2.6 kernel changeover period will make for some
hectic workloads. :(

-- 
Archaic

The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can
bribe the people with their own money.

- Alexis de Tocqueville

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page