Re: securety related question...

Richard Lightman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Bill maltby - LFS Related <[email protected]> [2002-10-06 10:32]:
> 
> I do this on my LFS installs for chapters 6 - (almost) 9. I do it to avoid
> copy of sources (saving space) while still allowing sources to be avail-
> able inside chroot to $LFS. Further, I do the mount as read only, thereby
> safegaurding the sources from accidental corruption by any of the root
> activities inside the $LFS jail. No problem, no noticed performance
> issues.
> 
Could you check that you can bind a rw device ro? I read somewhere
that there was a patch to keep separate mount flags for each mount,
but it does not appear to be there yet:

[root@urusai root]# mount --version; uname -a
mount: mount-2.11u
Linux urusai.localnet.rcl 2.4.20-pre8 #1 Thu Oct 3 07:52:50 BST 2002 i686 unknown
[root@urusai root]# mount -o ro --bind /tmp /floppy
[root@urusai root]# ls /tmp
[root@urusai root]# touch /floppy/x
[root@urusai root]# ls /tmp
x
[root@urusai root]# grep ^tmp /proc/mounts
tmp /tmp tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
tmp /floppy tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
[root@urusai root]#

Richard
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to [email protected]
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-security' in the subject header of the message
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.