Re: LFS Paper on Secure Servers
Ricardo Barberis <[email protected]> Mon, 10 May 2004 16:20:09 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Organization | Dattatec.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El Lunes 03 Mayo 2004 05:50, Bostjan Skufca (at) domenca.si escribió: > Hello, < snip > > Filesystem: > I (personally of course) prefer reiserfs (v3) to ext3 as it feels more > robust and I (personally and at a company) never had problems with it. One problem with reiserfs is that it doesn't have quota support in v3. That's why we still use ext3 in our servers (hosting). But I agree with you about its performance and robustness. Oh well, we'll have to wait for v4 ;) Cheers. - -- Ricardo Barberis SysAdmin - Datacenter Dattatec.com Hosting Solutions -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAn9XqnabpmElFaJkRAk9uAJ0Z0TGzGasha/1LxjIc+zhbC6IBZwCfdMEc pDt1Bt7V8ktc/ZMoiA6otLY= =nMoI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page