Re: LFS Paper on Secure Servers
"Bostjan Skufca (at) domenca.si" <[email protected]> Tue, 11 May 2004 11:05:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quota patches (anyone should read FAQ first:) ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/ Off topic? True. On Monday 10 of May 2004 21:20, Ricardo Barberis wrote: > El Lunes 03 Mayo 2004 05:50, Bostjan Skufca (at) domenca.si escribió: > > Hello, > > < snip > > > > Filesystem: > > I (personally of course) prefer reiserfs (v3) to ext3 as it feels more > > robust and I (personally and at a company) never had problems with it. > > One problem with reiserfs is that it doesn't have quota support in v3. > That's why we still use ext3 in our servers (hosting). > But I agree with you about its performance and robustness. > > Oh well, we'll have to wait for v4 ;) > > Cheers. > -- > Ricardo Barberis > SysAdmin - Datacenter > Dattatec.com > Hosting Solutions -- Z lepimi pozdravi, Bostjan Skufca sistemski administrator Domenca d.o.o. Tel: +386 4 5835444 Fax: +386 4 5831999 http://www.domenca.si -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page