Re: LFS Paper on Secure Servers
Jason Gurtz <[email protected]> Mon, 04 Oct 2004 08:42:34 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/2/2004 19:16, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I also did a check on BIND and found no security issues reported of the > last two years. That indicates a pretty solid package to me, especially > for one so well known. AFAIK, BIND 9 was a reimplementation, written from from scratch, from the ground up with a particular eye on not having things like buffer overflows and etc... in the code. I think there has been one or two advisories, but they were minor things and not something that would get one r00ted. :) Let's hope the sendmail rewrite has as good or better luck Cheers, ~Jason -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page