Re: LFS Paper on Secure Servers

Jason Gurtz <[email protected]> Mon, 04 Oct 2004 08:42:34 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/2/2004 19:16, Bruce Dubbs wrote:

>  I also did a check on BIND and found no security issues reported of the 
> last two years.  That indicates a pretty solid package to me, especially 
> for one so well known.

AFAIK, BIND 9 was a reimplementation, written from from scratch, from the
ground up with a particular eye on not having things like buffer overflows
and etc... in the code.

I think there has been one or two advisories, but they were minor things
and not something that would get one r00ted.  :)  Let's hope the sendmail
rewrite has as good or better luck

Cheers,

~Jason

-- 
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-security
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page