RE: securety related question...

On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Bob Kimmel wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Bill
> > maltby - LFS Related
> > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:51 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: securety related question...
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Soft Skulled Person wrote:
> 
> <snip>
>
<snip>
 
> Oh no, I didn't want to be responsible for sleep deprivation :-)

No problem - that's better than humor-deprivation. :)

><snip>
 
> [...] I have frequently found your posts helpful, and always the model
> of diplomacy...

Either you missed one or two of my replies about two weeks or so back, or
you are the "model of...". I had a "bad hair" day, I guess.

> > Item 2: "soft-skulled" = malleable = amenable to change in form or
> > function. There may be the seeds of creativity there. And survivability. I
> > <snip>

> Yes, in fact, it is ironic that I have been soft-skulled of late, as I
> have on at least one occasion been told that my skull is so hard it must
> be made of a substance previously unknown to science...perhaps I am aging
> in reverse!

Certainly you realize it is always *they* who are hard-headed, not us?

> > > BK
> ><snip>

> BK
> 
> Bob Kimmel
> Bendheim Center for Finance
> Department of Economics
> Princeton University
> [email protected]

-- 
Bill Maltby
[email protected]

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to [email protected]
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-security' in the subject header of the message