Re: LFS build of File-5.45 problem stops on compilation of seccomp.c
"Bruce Dubbs" ([email protected] via lfs-support Mailing List) <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:36:11 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/20/25 10:22 AM, Xi Ruoyao ([email protected] via lfs-support Mailing List) wrote: > On Thu, 2025-02-20 at 09:20 -0600, dave kohler wrote: >> attempt to open /mnt/lfs/lib/../lib/libseccomp.so succeeded > > So this means your symlink is indeed incorrect. The symlink > /mnt/lfs/lib should points to the relative path usr/lib, not the > absolute path /usr/lib. > > The mistake also caused the command > > chown -v lfs $LFS/{usr{,/*},lib,var,etc,bin,sbin,tools} > > to change your /usr/lib to be owned by LFS, triggering the warning from > Arch package manager you've mentioned in another thread. > > Now you need to fix your host distro before another attempt of LFS > build. First run "chown root /usr/lib /usr/bin" to fix the ownership. > > Then you need to check if there is any file/directory owned by the LFS > user in your /usr/lib and /usr/bin. For each one, figure out which Arch > package should provide that file or directory, then reinstall the Arch > package. If no Arch package should provide it, just remove it. > > After fixing Arch, start over building LFS and make sure typing correct > commands this time. > > I guess we should just remove $LFS/lib, $LFS/bin, and $LFS/sbin from the > chown command, so with an incorrect symlink the build will fail early at > Chapter 5 Glibc instead of silently breaking the host distro. I'll do > it after the 12.3 release. It sounds like the original mistake was running the chown command above as root, but $LFS was not defined for the root user. Note the caution in Section 2.6. Setting the $LFS Variable and the Umask. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-support Unsubscribe: See the above information page