Re: LFS 12.4: 8.59. Coreutils-9.7 test suite fails: tests/chroot/chroot-credentials.sh
"\"Random Penguin\"" ([email protected] via lfs-support Mailing List) <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Nov 2025 11:53:36 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> I can't really see what the problem is, but you might want to compare >>>>> your >>>>> results with ours at >>>>> >>>>> https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/12.4/i7-14700K/test-logs/857-coreutils-9.7 >>>>> >>>>> -- Bruce >>>> >>>> I checked the results of both machines, however both of them pass without >>>> any >>>> error and no further elaboration. Could someone maybe send their test log >>>> to see what should be happening? >>> >>> What should be happening is that the tests succeed: >>> [...] >>> PASS: tests/chroot/chroot-credentials.sh >>> [...] >>> >>> If they don't, it's likely that you made a mistake somewhere. I suggest >>> that you re-check your every step after >>> >>> "Now the test suite is ready to be run. First, run the tests that are >>> meant to be run as user root: [...]" >>> >>> Rainer >> >> Running from /sources/coreutils-9.7 with root user: >> "make NON_ROOT_USERNAME=tester check-root" >> >> It's literally the first test command that fails. And I typed it twice, one >> for with the i18n patch and one for without, so there's no mistyping >> happening. > >It's generally safer (and faster) to copy/paste the commands instead of > typing. Perhaps you've made a mistake earlier in that chapter? If not, > I don't know what went wrong. The i18n-patch did not cause any problems > for me and there should be no FAILS: > > grep -E 'FAIL|XFAIL' coreutils-9.7.log-2025-06-05 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 0 > > Rainer For one, I am doing the chroot on a literal Arch Linux installation media because the only Linux machine I have access to is a homebrewed Nintendo Switch on kernel 4.9, so no way that's happening. For two, what could be the possible mistakes? What libraries/binaries could've raised that error? Should I recompile it? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-support Unsubscribe: See the above information page