Re: Dump commands
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 15.08.26 um 23:08 schrieb Pierre Labastie ([email protected] via lfs-support Mailing List): > On Sat, 2026-08-15 at 12:21 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> On Sat, 2026-08-15 at 11:22 +0200, Rainer Fiebig wrote: >> >>> >>> Cosmetics matter - just take the boom in plastic surgery as an >>> indication. But seriously: the heading-numbering is plain wrong >>> and >>> ugly - that it has gone unnoticed for so long doesn't make it any >>> better. To me it seems somewhat unworthy of a standard work in the >>> Linux world. And I think that removing a dot from a stylesheet vs. >>> correct headings provides an uncommonly favourable cost/benefit >>> ratio. >> >> The only problem is to dig into stylesheets which are modifications >> of >> docbook-xsl stylesheets written in 2006 or so... > > Ok, found it. Now I think periods shouldn't be removed everywhere. In > the book, we have: > > - parts: example: > III. Building the LFS Cross Toolchain and Temporary Tools > I wouldn't like having no separation between the roman numeral and the > title, so I propose to keep the period Agreed. > > - chapters: example: > Chapter 5. Compiling a Cross-Toolchain > Here too, I think it is good to have a separation. Maybe a dash "-" > instead of a period? I think the period here is OK and better than a dash. > > - sections: example: > 5.2. Binutils-2.47 - Pass 1 > Ok for removing the last period Agreed. > > - subsections: example: > 5.2.1. Installation of Cross Binutils > Ok too Agreed (for removing the last period). Thanks. Rainer -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-support Unsubscribe: See the above information page