Re: Dump commands

On Sun, 2026-08-16 at 12:45 +0200, Rainer Fiebig wrote:
> Am 15.08.26 um 23:08 schrieb Pierre Labastie ([email protected]
> via lfs-support Mailing List):
> > On Sat, 2026-08-15 at 12:21 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2026-08-15 at 11:22 +0200, Rainer Fiebig wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Cosmetics matter - just take the boom in plastic surgery as an
> > > > indication.  But seriously: the heading-numbering is plain
> > > > wrong
> > > > and
> > > > ugly - that it has gone unnoticed for so long doesn't make it
> > > > any
> > > > better.  To me it seems somewhat unworthy of a standard work in
> > > > the
> > > > Linux world.  And I think that removing a dot from a stylesheet
> > > > vs.
> > > > correct headings provides an uncommonly favourable cost/benefit
> > > > ratio.
> > > 
> > > The only problem is to dig into stylesheets which are
> > > modifications
> > > of
> > > docbook-xsl stylesheets written in 2006 or so...
> > 
> > Ok, found it. Now I think periods shouldn't be removed everywhere.
> > In
> > the book, we have:
> > 
> > - parts: example:
> > III. Building the LFS Cross Toolchain and Temporary Tools 
> > I wouldn't like having no separation between the roman numeral and
> > the
> > title, so I propose to keep the period
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > 
> > - chapters: example:
> > Chapter 5. Compiling a Cross-Toolchain
> > Here too, I think it is good to have a separation. Maybe a dash "-"
> > instead of a period?
> 
> I think the period here is OK and better than a dash.
> 
> > 
> > - sections: example:
> > 5.2. Binutils-2.47 - Pass 1 
> > Ok for removing the  last period
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > 
> > - subsections: example:
> > 5.2.1. Installation of Cross Binutils
> > Ok too
> 
> Agreed (for removing the last period).
> 
> Thanks.

Should be fixed at commit 09b2899225
And appear in next rendered book

Pierre

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-support
Unsubscribe: See the above information page