Re: LFS-R13.0 on RPI 4 and 5
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 17.08.26 um 22:26 schrieb Pocket ([email protected] via lfs-support Mailing List): > > > On 8/17/26 14:54, md ([email protected] via lfs-support Mailing > List) wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Do I understand correctly that you took the x86_64 (default) LFS >> branch and >> patched it to build on arm64 (aarch64)? > > Yes that is correct > >> Could you comment how many changes were needed compared to this failed >> attempt >> https://github.com/marcindulak/jhalfs-ci/issues/1 from 2022? >> > > gcc and binutils, used gcc flags is the brunt of the changes. > added one sed for the lib64 issue. > > >> The question to the LFS maintainers: >> What is the state of arm64 support in LFS and JHALFS >> (https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/alfs/)? >> >> Best regards, >> Marcin >> > > The answer you will seek will be we only do x86_64/amd64 Would be understandable. They even had to drop the SysV-version for lack of man-/editor-power. But congrats on your achievement! However, I do think that you should tell us the SBU for your Pi-5. Seems that I'm not the only one who is interested in that. Now that your build is complete, just run the binutils-build again with a DESTDIR-installation and let us know. Or would that lock-up your device for too long? Thanks. Rainer > -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-support Unsubscribe: See the above information page