Re: LFS-R13.0 on RPI 4 and 5

On 8/17/26 17:10, Rainer Fiebig ([email protected] via lfs-support Mailing 
List) wrote:
> Am 17.08.26 um 22:26 schrieb Pocket ([email protected] via
> lfs-support Mailing List):
>>
>>
>> On 8/17/26 14:54, md ([email protected] via lfs-support Mailing
>> List) wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Do I understand correctly that you took the x86_64 (default) LFS
>>> branch and
>>> patched it to build on arm64 (aarch64)?
>>
>> Yes that is correct
>>
>>> Could you comment how many changes were needed compared to this failed
>>> attempt
>>> https://github.com/marcindulak/jhalfs-ci/issues/1 from 2022?
>>>
>>
>> gcc and binutils, used gcc flags is the brunt of the changes.
>> added one sed for the lib64 issue.
>>
>>
>>> The question to the LFS maintainers:
>>> What is the state of arm64 support in LFS and JHALFS
>>> (https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/alfs/)?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Marcin
>>>
>>
>> The answer you will seek will be we only do x86_64/amd64
> 
> Would be understandable.  They even had to drop the SysV-version for
> lack of man-/editor-power.
> 
> But congrats on your achievement!  However, I do think that you should
> tell us the SBU for your Pi-5.  Seems that I'm not the only one who is
> interested in that.  Now that your build is complete, just run the
> binutils-build again with a DESTDIR-installation and let us know.  Or
> would that lock-up your device for too long?  Thanks.
> 
> Rainer
> 

I don't understand the "need" for the SBU.  As I stated before it is not 
meaningful to me.  The end result is.

I built this on my rpi 5 desktop (running archlinuxarm LXQT desktop) 
while browsing the web and doing other things all while playing a 
Godzilla movie.  After all it is my daily driver.


-- 
Hindi madali ang maging ako

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/lfs-support
Unsubscribe: See the above information page