Re: libdl bugs

Hi all,

A script this young and already a bug has to be fixed:

Markus Wichmann schrieb:
> #v+
> if [ -r /etc/diet.ld.conf ]
> then
>     libdir="$( </etc/diet.ld.conf sed '/^#/d; /^\s*$/d' | tr '\n' ':')"
> fi
>
> if [ -n "$LIBDIR" ]
> then
>     libdir="${libdir}${libdir:+:}$LIBDIR"
> fi
>
> if [ -z "$libdir" ]
> then
>     libdir="/lib:/usr/lib"
> fi
>
- if [ "$1" == "-v" ]
+ if [ "$1" = "-v" ]
> then
>     VERBOSE="-v"
> fi
>
> oldIFS="$IFS"
> IFS=:
> set -- $libdir
> IFS="
> "
>
> for i
> do
>     if [ -d "$i" ]; then
>         for j in "$i"/*
>         do
>             if [ -f "$j" ]
>             then
>                 soname=$(readelf -d "$j" | grep SONAME)
>                 if [ -n "$soname" ]
>                 then
>                     soname=$(echo $soname |\
                          sed -e 's/.*\[//' -e 's/\].*//')
+                     if [ "$soname" != "$j" ]; then
>                         ln -sf $VERBOSE "$j" "$soname"
+                     fi
>                 fi
>             fi
>         done
>     fi
> done
>
> IFS="$oldIFS"
> #v-

That should do it now. Doesn't work for multilib targets, though, but who
needs multilib, anyway? Only people relying on already-compiled
proprietary software. Most of it will be compiled for use with glibc. So
it'll be software that will never work with dietlibc anyway, so why
bother?

Regards,
Markus
-- 
Progress (n.): Process through which USENET evolved from smart people in
front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart terminals.