Re: Wrong define for dev_t

Le vendredi 21 mai 2010 à 03:01 +0200, Felix von Leitner a écrit :
> > I had a bug here where sda16 was created as 3:0 instead of 259:0
> 
> > I found that this is because on x86 dev_t is wrong, it is uint16_t
> > instead of uint32_t
> 
> The dev_t declaration comes from the kernel and is correct.
>
>
> Also, on my system:
> 
>   # mknod foo b 2 259; ls -l foo
>   brw-r--r--    1 root     root       2, 259 May 21 03:00 foo
>   # file =mknod =ls
>   /opt/diet/bin/mknod: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, stripped
>   /opt/diet/bin/ls:    ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, stripped
>   #
> 
> Felix
> 

Yes on x86-64 it works fine, not on i386