Re: Fwd: Bug#618480: __unified_syscall bug

> maybe someone has an idea. I don’t think a function needs a
> “frame pointer” but have no idea about that cfi thing.

The cfi stuff is in the wrong syntax, at least for my as version
(current binutils).  Also this is about exception handling, which I
don't think we need because we call a syscall, not a function pointer
into userland which could potentially throw exceptions.

I suggest debugging the signal issue with glibc and then use
dietlibc for the final program :-)

Felix