Re: same prog, different sizes
Erik Weber <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:07:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lib.dietlibc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi guys,
please provide concise descriptions:
- program to be compiled (f.i. dash x.x.z, file xxx.tgz from site yyy,
URL to download, GIT reference with download-day or something in this
direction),
- platform (f.i. Debian testing on ARM / I7... whatever hardware) ,
- compiler ("gcc --version" )
- which dietlibc (file... from URL....)
- what was expected behavior, and what was the real output
(compiler/linker; from program itself)
Sorry for typos.
Best regards
Erik Weber.
On 17.09.2014 20:10, Steven Honeyman wrote:
> On 17 September 2014 18:53, Felix von Leitner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "produces broken programs" means to me "all programs compiled against it
>> don't work".
>>
>> What you actually have is "one program does not work right, and I'm not
>> even sure it's dietlibc's fault". I for one have never heard of dash
>> and have trouble even finding the source code.
> Really? It's been Debian's default shell for years https://wiki.debian.org/Shell
> The source code is quite well hidden:
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/dash/dash.git
>
> If it worked in 0.33 fine, and the exact same source compiles without
> a warning, error, or problem (in every libc known to man, including
> klibc) - would that suggest it's a bug in dietlibc?
> Do you have a test suite or suggestion for a bunch of "known good"
> programs (that include tests), I can compile with both versions and
> let you know the results?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Steven