Re: Differences in iwspy !!!
Vikram KAUL <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:10:35 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.linux-wlan.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Folks, I haven't heard from anyone on this. Resending it to stress the importance, not just for me, but for everyone out there. Look at my original email and see why the stats are not correct. Is there a way to validate this ? Can anyone on the list do a simple experiment and cross check/validate/invalidate what I am seeing. Thanks in anticipation Vikram On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Vikram KAUL wrote: vkaul>Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:54:42 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) vkaul>From: Vikram KAUL <[email protected]> vkaul>To: [email protected] vkaul>Cc: [email protected] vkaul>Subject: Differences in iwspy !!! vkaul> vkaul> vkaul>Hi Folks, vkaul> vkaul> I have the same laptop running two different cards with two different vkaul>drivers: vkaul> vkaul>eth0: Lucent Orinoco Gold -> "orinoco-0.15rc3" driver vkaul>wlan0: Linksys WCF12 with pcmcia adapter -> linux-wlan-ng-0.2.2" vkaul> vkaul>Both belong to the same ad-hoc group and are "iwspy"ing two other nodes vkaul>which belong to the same ad-hoc group as well. A broadcast ping with 200ms vkaul>interval ensures 'freshness' of the iwspy measurements. Here is what I vkaul>see: vkaul> vkaul>wlan0 Statistics collected: vkaul> 00:02:2D:64:5A:55 : Quality=32/92 Signal level=-100 dBm Noise vkaul>level=-132 dBm vkaul> 00:02:2D:64:5A:4B : Quality=36/92 Signal level=-96 dBm Noise vkaul>level=-132 dBm vkaul> Link/Cell/AP : Quality=0/92 Signal level=-100 dBm Noise vkaul>level=-100 dBm vkaul> Typical/Reference : Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0 vkaul> vkaul>eth1 Statistics collected: vkaul> 00:02:2D:64:5A:55 : Quality=49/92 Signal level=-42 dBm Noise vkaul>level=-91 dBm vkaul> 00:02:2D:64:5A:4B : Quality=56/92 Signal level=-39 dBm Noise vkaul>level=-95 dBm vkaul> Link/Cell/AP : Quality:49/92 Signal level:-42 dBm Noise vkaul>level:-91 dBm vkaul> Typical/Reference : Quality:36/92 Signal level:-62 dBm Noise vkaul>level:-98 dBm vkaul> vkaul>Notice that the signal level and noise level are off by a very large vkaul>margin in the two measurements. vkaul> vkaul>Why is that ? The measurement cards are in two adjacent slots. I am seeing vkaul>this very consistently. vkaul> vkaul>I can provide more derails if anyone wanted so vkaul> vkaul>Thanks in advance vkaul> vkaul>Vikram vkaul> vkaul>