Re: Re: Differences in iwspy !!!
[email protected] Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:27:01 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.linux-wlan.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:35:30AM -0700, Eric Brombaugh wrote: > buglists. The basic problem is that _every_ WLAN card manufacturer uses > a different metric for reporting signal & noise power. Consequently, the > power numbers you get from the cards are not apples/apples and need to > be recalibrated depending on who made them. Adding that capability to > the WLAN drivers is not considered critical since it doesn't have any > noticable effect on data traffic. Add to this the fact that, for example, even across firmware revisions the signal measurement metric can change -- and this did happen in the prism2 line. I didn't write the IWSPY code in linux-wlan-ng, but it seems that it is improperly handling signal strength reporting. Even under the best of circumstances, these figures will never be more than a general "in the ballpark" value. - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy [email protected] AbsoluteValue Systems http://www.linux-wlan.com 721-D North Drive +1 (321) 259-0737 (office) Melbourne, FL 32934 +1 (321) 259-0286 (fax) _______________________________________________ Linux-wlan-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-wlan.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-wlan-user
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDjcTFhinxHf95MjYRAik8AJ42WY1PYNDAYOX1SmvMRHpmydmFcQCeLzTv s+dh1QpZjl4GOh05ToLYeAo= =9SL3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----