Re: Idea for navigation

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Aaron Peterson wrote:

> > feel free to enter whatever info you like, but it will likely get edited
> > to follow the format we follow.  Also, the "backlinks" you desire are only
> > ever a single click away.
> A link  that quite a few won't find unless they see some note about that 
> capability of the wiki, 

	What do you think about moving the "What links here" to the Browse 
nav box?

> > > and doesn't need the navigational structure  (moderators)  Does that
> > > moderator put a link up from blarny to bar?  No! not currently.
> >
> > 	If they are related there should either be a link in the article
> > text and a link in ==See also==.
> 
> Who defines what is related?
> well... how about the person who sees the relation? Oh wait... Moderators 
> ignore the ethics of wiki's and delete stuff that isn't harming the site...

	I am still not clear why you are unwilling to put what you have 
been putting on the top of the page in "Backlinks" and "Member of" links 
into the standard ==See also== section.  I have also not see anyone remove 
content you have put into a ==See also== section.

--jeremy