Re: Idea for navigation

Jeremy <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:57:57 -0500 (EST)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.linuxquestions.wiki
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Aaron Peterson wrote:

> 4. Backlinks have some good and bad qualities.
>  good, it's thourough.
> 
>  bad, it gets all the links relation to the page mixed up, (kinda like the 
> current ==See Also== sections)
> 
>  good, it povides a way back to the page that they got to it from, one often 
> times uses a book mark, or browser autocompletion to bet back to a page, and 
> the history information is gone
> 
>  bad server intesnive?

	Yes.
> 
> good automatic alphabetical listing!!
> good instantly updated!

	BUT, we do not have backlinks as you'd like them implemented and 
have no plans to change the implementation at this time.  While I do 
appreciate all feedback and make *many* changes based on the feedback I 
get, we do not (and can not) implement every suggestion we get.  There 
comes a time when continuing to discuss the same subject becomes 
counter-productive.

--jeremy