Re: Idea for navigation
Jeremy <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:57:57 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.linuxquestions.wiki |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Aaron Peterson wrote: > 4. Backlinks have some good and bad qualities. > good, it's thourough. > > bad, it gets all the links relation to the page mixed up, (kinda like the > current ==See Also== sections) > > good, it povides a way back to the page that they got to it from, one often > times uses a book mark, or browser autocompletion to bet back to a page, and > the history information is gone > > bad server intesnive? Yes. > > good automatic alphabetical listing!! > good instantly updated! BUT, we do not have backlinks as you'd like them implemented and have no plans to change the implementation at this time. While I do appreciate all feedback and make *many* changes based on the feedback I get, we do not (and can not) implement every suggestion we get. There comes a time when continuing to discuss the same subject becomes counter-productive. --jeremy