Re: Recent SPAM on lkcd-general
Tobias DiPasquale <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:29:05 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lkcd.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Cipher Block Chain Gang |
| Message-ID | <1076603344.4304.15.camel@localhost> |
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 10:46, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > The lists could use some spam filtering, agreed. > > I cannot agree that they should be restricted to members-only posting, > however. And the SF lists that I often use are not so restricted. > (e.g., linux-usb-users, linux-usb-devel, linux-hotplug-devel) I disagree. If they want to speak on LKCD, they should join the list. There's no reason to introduce false positives/negatives into this list just on the off-chance the someone might report a bug without being subscribed once. Its easy enough to subscribe. Lock it down, I say. P.S. It's a lot more than 6/4 spam-to-ham ratio, btw. -- Tobias DiPasquale, www.cbcg.net 202A 04C4 2CE6 B985 8520 88D6 CD25 1A6C B9B5 1595
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAK6nQzSUabLm1FZURAqQ9AJ4x+OMXh20gsR8Q8gwDc68itixDkgCfbI1C 7z0c0ofMp5cSz2eESg3lHkY= =DzQ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----