RE: LKCD Installation on RH AS 2.1
"Deepak Kumar Gupta, Noida" <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:14:12 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lkcd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1B3885BC15C7024C845AAC78314766C503A1E852@exch-01.noida.hcltech.com> |
Hi Nathan The patch you are using is for stock kernel 2.4.9 (download from www.kernel.org <http://www.kernel.org> ) and it is not for Redhat patched kernel. Red hat has made changes in stock kernel so the patch is not applicable for Redhat Patched kernel. Regards Deepak Kumar Gupta HCL Technologies Ltd. NOIDA -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Nathan P Ave-lallemant Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 10:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [lkcd-general] LKCD Installation on RH AS 2.1 All, HELP! I am trying to install LKCD onto a Dell PowerEdge 6650 running Red Hat Linux Advanced Server 2.1 and the 2.4.9-e.25enterprise kernel. Here are my results: 1. Install kernel-source-2.4.9-e.25.i386.rpm. 2. Copy /usr/src/linux-2.4.9-e.25 to /usr/src/linux-2.4.9-e.25.lkcd 3. cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.9-e.25.lkcd 4. patch -p1 < /root/lkcd-4.1-1-2.4.9.patch This is where the trouble starts. I get many errors of the following types: Hunk #1 succeeded at 162 with fuzz 1 (offset 14 lines). Hunk #2 FAILED at 262. Hunk #3 succeeded at 290 with fuzz 2 (offset 31 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 350 (offset 19 lines). 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej can't find file to patch at input line 63 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -Naur linux/arch/alpha/config.in linux-2.4.9.lkcd/arch/alpha/config.in |--- linux/arch/alpha/config.in Sun Aug 12 23:21:41 2001 |+++ linux-2.4.9.lkcd/arch/alpha/config.in Thu May 30 15:26:24 2002 Not only are there many hunks that fail, but it also complains about missing seven different files. When I finish and menuconfig the option to enable lkcd doesn't even appear in the Kernel Hacking section. Am I using the wrong patch for this kernel, or is there another issue anyone can see? Thanks, Nathan P. Ave-Lallemant