Re: tux assistant idea
"Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302041126460.14162-100000@dell> |
On 4 Feb 2003, George Kraft wrote: > Currently, we have over a dozen LSB certified systems following the > FHS. i have to ask yet again -- what is the deal with FHS? nothing has changed at pathname.com in months. has this all been subsumed under the LSB? can anyone explain this? rday